首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating Promotional Approaches for Citizen Science\ud Biological Recording: Bumblebees as a Group Versus\ud Harmonia axyridis as a Flagship for Ladybirds
【2h】

Evaluating Promotional Approaches for Citizen Science\ud Biological Recording: Bumblebees as a Group Versus\ud Harmonia axyridis as a Flagship for Ladybirds

机译:评估公民科学的推广方法\ ud 生物记录:大黄蜂作为一个整体\ ud 瓢虫谐音作为瓢虫的旗舰

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over the past decade, the number of biological records submitted by members of the public have increased dramatically. However, this may result in reduced record quality, depending on how species are promoted in the media. Here we examined the two main promotional approaches for citizen science recording schemes: flagship-species, using one charismatic species as an umbrella for the entire group (here, Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) for Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), and general-group, where the group is promoted as a whole and no particular prominence is given to any one species (here, bumblebees, genus Bombus (Hymenoptera: Apidae)). Of the two approaches, the\udgeneral-group approach produced data that was not\udbiased towards any one species, but far fewer records\udper year overall. In contrast, the flagship-species\udapproach generated a much larger annual dataset, but\udheavily biased towards the flagship itself. Therefore,\udwe recommend that the approach for species promotion\udis fitted to the result desired.
机译:在过去的十年中,公众提交的生物学记录数量急剧增加。但是,这可能会导致记录质量下降,具体取决于媒体中如何促进物种发展。在这里,我们研究了公民科学记录计划的两种主要推广方法:旗舰种,使用一种超凡魅力的物种作为整个群体的伞(此处为鞘翅目的Harmonia axyridis(Pallas):球藻)和普通群体,其中整个种群都得到了提升,没有对任何一个物种(这里的大黄蜂,熊蜂属(膜翅目:Apidae))给予特别的重视。在这两种方法中,“预算组”方法产生的数据对任何一个物种都不具有“偏见性”,但总体上每年的记录数却少得多。相反,旗舰物种\ udapproach产生了更大的年度数据集,但是\ udid偏向旗舰本身。因此,\ udwe建议将物种推广的方法与所需结果相适应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号